May 25, 2009
Here is the recap of our May newsletter:
Comments Off |
News and Press Releases | Tagged: BLADE, Blade Network, distribution channel, enews, Europe, IP SAN, may, news, newsletter, virtualization |
Permalink
Posted by Shonal Narayan
May 19, 2009
We have great news from our testing lab: The Voyager is our fastest SAN appliance yet. OK, so that isn’t really new news but here’s what our engineers said:
We completed testing the Voyager with many 10Gb Ethernet switches, and found that using BLADE’s RackSwitch G8124 delivers the fastest IP SAN performance with over 950 megabytes/sec.
Wow 950 MB/s is fast! So fast in fact, that our joint Voyager-RackSwitch solution sped of to Vegas, and beat everyone else to the show. If you are in town, you can check out our solution in booth #1175 at Interop, from May 18-21.
Learn more by checking out the links below:
Leave a Comment » |
10GbE, IP SAN, StoneFly, datacenter, iSCSI, virtual servers | Tagged: 10 gig ethernet, BLADE, Blade Network, ethernet switch, interop, IP SAN, tradeshow, voyager |
Permalink
Posted by Shonal Narayan
May 18, 2009
Guess #1: Privately owned estate?
Guess#2: Prince of Egypt?
Guess #3: Edgar Allan’s last name?
Guess #4: Wasn’t she the one who sang “Trigger Happy Jack?“
Actually, in the surveillance industry, PoE stands for Power over Ethernet. The concept is quite simple: You plug your Ethernet cable to your camera’s Ethernet port and plug the other end of the cable into a PoE switch, and you get power. Simple enough right? Not quite. There are other factors you must consider when deploying PoE powered cameras, such as PoE switch types and classifications.
Here is a list of the four power classes:
Class 1 – 4.5 watts at PoE port; 3.84 watts at device
Class 2 – 7.5 watts at PoE port; 6.49 watts at device
Class 3 – 15.4 watts at PoE port; 12.95 watts at device
Class 0 – 15.4 watts at PoE port; .44 to 12.95 watts at device
Not all PoE powered cameras will work with your switch, so you must consider which class your switch and cameras fall under. Want more information on the classifications, check out this article from IPSecurityWatch.
1 Comment |
IP Surveillance, dnf security | Tagged: camera management, ethernet, ip camera, IP security, PoE, power over ethernet, surveillance |
Permalink
Posted by Shonal Narayan
May 15, 2009
Here’s some great advice from the Enterprise Storage Forum on cutting storage costs.
- Try flash or solid state disk. Amazingly enough, with the speedy performance on SSD, it is probably cheaper than adding more memory to your heavy duty database clusters. I’d recommend trying an ISC with SSD, to save money and still have speedy performance.
- Use tiers. You don’t need to keep all of your data on high priced disks. Mix it up. Some data on SAS, some on SSD and some on SATA.
- Use SATA as much as possible. See the tip above. I bet 65% of your data can reside on slower disks. You’ll get more capacity for the money, and have more space to consolidate with.
- Shop around for deals. You shop around for your computers, gadgets and cell phone service. Do the same for your storage. Most vendors sell through the channel, and one of these channels will have a better deal for the same part number. Ask your vendor if they have a trade-in program as well. You might as well get credit for your old, out-of-date systems.
- Consolidate, consolidate, consolidate. It doesn’t make sense to have inidividual arrays for every application server, since as you increase servers, you’ll need twice the hardware. Consolidate over the network with NAS, iSCSI or fibre channel. Less harware = less ongoing maintenence costs.
- Try Windows Single Instance Storage feature. This is a way to dedupe, and make sure you only retain a single copy of each file. (Ahem email attachments to your team.)
- Lease equipment. Leasing is a great way to reduce capital expenditures and keep you from dealing with outdated equipment all the time. Try it. We all know how Moore’s law works: next year your system will be outdated.
- Go open-source. Have you used Amanda? It is a great open-source backup application. Are there other ways for you to leverage opensource? Look around. You might be able to get away with FreeNAS for your developers. No need to spend extra resources on test systems when you don’t need to.
Check out the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
DNF Storage, IP SAN, StoneFly, Storage, backup, iSCSI, virtual servers | Tagged: datacenter, IT costs, open-source, server consolidation, SSD, storage consolidation, tiered storage, windows |
Permalink
Posted by Jame-Ane Ervin
May 13, 2009
A couple of weeks ago we did a webinar on virtual servers, iSCSI, vSphere and storage consolidation.
Quick refresher on the discussion:
- Setting up iSCSI storage for Virtual Servers
- Using advanced storage features for improved virtual server management
- Managing large environments with 50+ virtual servers
- Why the number of simultaneous iSCSI sessions matters
- Relying on virtual servers and IP SANs for disaster recovery
- How ESX 4 will impact your storage environment
Check out the archived virtualization webinar video or the slide deck. Enjoy!
Leave a Comment » |
10GbE, StoneFly, Storage, Tutorial, iSCSI, virtual servers | Tagged: ip storage, iSCSI, storage consolidation, virtual servers, virtualization, vmware, vsphere, webinar, xenserver |
Permalink
Posted by Jame-Ane Ervin
May 7, 2009
Did you hear about this one? Apparently, somebody hacked into Virginia Department of Health Professions’ website last week, and is holding state medical records for ransom. The claims have not been verified as of yet, but the hacker’s note states that he/she broke into the state-run website and destroyed the original and created an encrypted backup file which would be handed over for $10M. Here’s the note:
“I have your [expletive]. In my possession, right now, are 8,257,378 patient records and a total of 35,548,087 prescriptions. Also, I made an encrypted backup and deleted the original. Unfortunately for Virginia, their backups seem to have gone missing, too. Uhoh
For $10 million, I will gladly send along the password.”
A spokesperson from the Department claims that a few of the systems have been restored and complete restoration is due soon. If the statement is true, kudos to the IT department for doing what they should (keeping physical backups).
Here’s the full article. We’ll keep you up to date as more information is revealed.
Leave a Comment » |
DNF Storage, Storage, backup, datacenter | Tagged: backup, data backup, data corruption, data protection, data security, encryption, hackers, network security, tape backup |
Permalink
Posted by Shonal Narayan
May 4, 2009
This post is brought to you by the worst pickup line ever.
Prospective customers always ask…
Can I purchase your system without drives? They are available on the open market at a much lower cost.
And I agree. It is always easy to find a low price on hard drives. But what’s the cost of your time? How much time do you spend finding the best deal? And more importantly, how much time do you spend when you have a drive failure getting the replacement part?
From experience, we found it took far too long. And we have relationships with our drive manufacturers. Sometimes we wait 2 weeks for a replacement! I don’t know if you have two weeks to wait. To solve the problem, or at least reduce its impact on you, we created our RAID certification process.With RAID Certified drives, DNF customers experience a 50% lower drive failure rate compare to standard and RAID edition drives.
So my short answer to the prospective customers…
We spend 120 hours testing each drive for you, so you won’t have to waste time replacing one.
1 Comment |
DNF Storage, Storage, backup | Tagged: customer, disk drive, drive failure, RAID, raid certification, RAID storage, testing |
Permalink
Posted by Jame-Ane Ervin